2010年4月14日星期三

Demolition Ordinance should not exist

2009 demolitions of the most seriously concerned about the incident is "Tang Fuzhen self-immolation\You think, "Demolition Ordinance" changes to ease the violent demolition of it?


Demolition Ordinance should not exist.


demolition caused by self-immolation incident,paul smith, all over the country. Following the launch of the property law, such removal should not have been there, but out of the land around the financial needs, but big push forward. Demolition has already violated the fundamental interests of the people, it must stop. Demolition Ordinance to change the property law in line with the compulsory purchase regulations. Regardless of whether the public interest, the individual does not consent, it can not force removal. If China can not establish the inviolability of private property, the legal doctrine, then our legal system is not established. Therefore, if the regulations were changed so as I said, may contain demolition. However, the central place to see whether the distribution of tax reform.

没有评论:

发表评论